Page 1
2
3
4
5
Mr
Newman,
I
know how busy you must be as you did not have the time
or the courtesy to return my phone calls, which your
Public Affairs representative vehemently promised you
would do by close of business yesterday...you are quickly
turning into an enemy of the Truth, which quickly
makes you an enemy of my friends and of me...And if
you think we are going away, you are not only mistaken,
but severely so!!! That is a promise and a threat!
As I
said in my previous emails,
you
are in a very precarious position!!
PS In respect
for your obviously over-priced investigative time, I
have just provided the conclusion portion of some very
detailed and accurate investigation that actually took
real time to accomplish! If you would like to see the
entire work of scientific art, just click on the link
below...and open your eyes, because we are watching
with ours!!!
Conclusion
Assuming
the premise of the official explanation, the total collapses
of the Twin Towers and Building 7 were the largest,
most unexpected, and least understood failures of engineered
steel structures in the history of the world. NIST's
Report, like FEMA's 2002 report, presents the appearance
of explaining the collapses of the Twin Towers, but
in reality it doesn't explain them at all. Flatly asserting
that "global collapse" inevitably follows "collapse
initiation," the Report implies that the only issue
worthy of study is how the jet impacts and fires led
to collapse initiation -- an issue to which it devotes
well over one hundred pages. Thus, the Report makes
two fundamental claims, the first explicit and the second
implicit:
- The impact
damage and fires caused the tops of the Towers to
lean and then begin to fall (collapse initiation).
- Once initiated,
the collapses proceeded to total collapses.
NIST goes
to great lengths to support the first claim, but commits
numerous omissions and distortions in the process. It
remains quiet about the second claim, except for its
vague rehash of the pile-driver theory. This is indefensible,
given NIST's charge to investigate the collapses. Accepting
that claim requires us to believe:
- That the
collapses of WTC 1, 2, and 7 are the only examples
of total progressive collapse of steel-framed structures
in history.
- That those
collapses were gravity-driven despite showing all
the common physical features of controlled demolitions.
In the cases of the Twin Towers, those features included
the following:
- Radial
symmetry: The Towers came straight down,
blowing debris symmetricaly in all directions.
- Rapid
descent: The Towers came down just slightly
slower than the rate of free-fall in a vacuum.
- Demolition
waves: The Towers were consumed by synchronized
rows of confluent explosions.
- Demolition
squibs: The Towers exhibited high-velocity
gas ejections well below the descending rubble.
- Pulverization:
The Towers' non-metallic components, such as their
concrete floors, were pulverized into fine dust.
- Totality:
The Towers were destroyed totally, their steel skeletons
shredded into short pieces, most less than 30 feet
long.
All of these
features are seen in conventional controlled demolitions.
None have ever been observed in steel-framed buildings
collapsing for any reason other than controlled demolition.
What are
the chances that a phenomenon other than controlled
demolition would exhibit all six features never observed
elsewhere except in controlled demolitions?
NIST avoids
asking this and other questions by implying that they
don't exist. It uses the false assertion that partial
collapse will inevitably lead to total collapse (couched
in the ill-defined terms of "column instability," "global
instability," "collapse initiation," and "global collapse")
to imply that nothing about the actual collapses is
worth considering.
To shield
the reader from the evidence of controlled demolition,
NIST fills hundreds of pages with amazingly realistic
plane crash simulations, tedious details about fire
tests and simulations, and long lists of recommendations
for improving building safety. It calls its event narrative
of each Tower, which starts with the jet impact and
ends at the point that "collapse ensued," the "probable
collapse sequence," but it is neither probable nor a
collapse sequence.
NIST's misleadingly
named "probable collapse sequence" is a mirage, masking
the explosive reality of the collapses with a cinematic
account of the crashes and fires. NIST's theory stops
at the moment that the "upper building section began
to move downwards," thus avoiding the longer timeline
of the truss-failure theory and any overlap with the
time span in which the demolition-like features appear.
Despite NIST's theory being even more incredible than
its predecessors (with spreading "column instability"
triggering "global collapse" in an instant) it works
better as a mirage because its timelines stop short
of the collapses.
NIST's Report
states that its first objective is to "determine why
and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed." The Report does
not fulfill that objective, and hides that failure with
misleading headings and disproportionate, misapplied
technical detail. Its authors should admit that they
have failed to explain why and how the Towers collapsed,
and should call for an investigation that will address
rather than avoid the issue.
Thanks
for your time if you actually got to the bottom of this
email as we will get to the bottom of WTC7 TRUTH!!!
Guy
S. Razer, LtCol, USAF (Retired but not Tired, Inspired!)
In
a land where tyranny is the primary rule of law,
the
only 2 unpatriotic acts,
in
the arena of communication, are
silence
and ungood doublequackspeak (1984 Newspeak)!!!
www.myspace.com/supereagle69
Alfons,
Thought you might like to see this...I actually received
acknowledgment of receipt of evidence from NIST!!! Now
we'll see what they do with it...
Dear NIST WTC Investigation Team,
I sincerely appreciate this email very much! I intended
no personal "threat" to anyone on your investigation
team, but only that I would not accept this information
going un-addressed. Again, thank you. There is more
information available. Is this the proper method of
input?
Guy S. Razer, LtCol, USAF (Retired but not Tired, Inspired!)
In
a land where tyranny is the primary rule of law,
the only 2 unpatriotic acts,
in the arena of communication, are
silence and ungood doublequackspeak (1984 Newspeak)!!!
www.myspace.com/supereagle69
----- Original Message ----
From: "wtc@nist.gov" <wtc@nist.gov>
To: guyrazer@yahoo.com
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 10:32:52 AM
Subject: Acknowledgment of received materials
Dear Col. Razer,
This
message is to acknowledge that NIST has received all
of the
materials that you have provided via e-mail regarding
the World Trade
Center buildings.
Sincerely,
The
WTC Investigation Team
Member/Associations:
www.PatriotsQuestion.com
www.PatriotCalendar.com
www.Pilotsfor911Truth.org
www.V911T.org
(Veterans for Truth)
www.stj911.org
(Scholars for Truth & Justice)
www.Visibility911.com
Interviews
on file with:
www.currentissues.tv
www.v911t.org
www.Pilotsfor911Truth.org
www.Visibility911.com
Page 1
2
3
4
5
|
