|
|
|
Page 1
2
3
4
5
My
question to you Mr Newman is...
How
are you going to explain away facts
so obvious that to cover them up is
in itself an act pure cowardice and
deserves severe punishment? As
I said in my first communication,
you are in a very precarious position
indeed!!!
A
BRIEF STUDY ON TEMPERATURE, STEEL,
MELTING, KEROSENE (aka Jet Fuel)
AND
LARRY
SILVERSTIEN'S BUILDINGS (aka WTC 1,2,7)
THAT HAVE
A TENDANCY TOWARD
RATHER
EXPLOSIVE COLLAPSE!!
Reference
map
The
Persistent Hot spots:
Thermal
images from
September 16, 2001 WTC 7 closest to
top of image.
More
than one month later, October
18, 2001, there are still hot spots
at
WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7.
Hot
Spots from the AVRIS Airborne Visible/Infrared
Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) Sensor
Sept 16, 2001 indexed A&B are WTC7
Table 1 Thermal Hot Spot Data (Again,
A&B are WTC7)
|
Location |
Temperature |
Area |
| Hot Spot |
N Latitude |
W Longitude |
(Kelvin) |
% FOV |
sq meter |
| A |
40o 42' 47.18" |
74o 00' 41.43" |
1000 |
15 |
0.56 |
| B |
40o 42' 47.14" |
74o 00' 43.53" |
830 |
2 |
0.08 |
| C |
40o 42' 42.89" |
74o 00' 48.88" |
900 |
20 |
0.8 |
| D |
40o 42' 41.99" |
74o 00' 46.94" |
790 |
20 |
0.8 |
| E |
40o 42' 40.58" |
74o 00' 50.15" |
710 |
10 |
0.4 |
| F |
40o 42' 38.74" |
74o 00' 46.70" |
700 |
10 |
0.4 |
| G |
40o 42' 39.94" |
74o 00' 45.37" |
1020 |
1 |
0.04 |
| H |
40o 42' 38.60" |
74o 00' 43.51" |
820 |
2 |
0.08 |
Positions are in degrees-minutes-decimal
seconds, datum WGS84.
Position accuracy is estimated to be
approximately +/- 6 meters (18 feet).
AND,
HOW DO YOU GET A 30' DEEP CRATER
UNDER
A MELTING BUILDING???
WTC
7 - 47 stories tall - debris pile 7
stories. The New York times has a crude
interactive map placing the crater
depth at -30 feet.
According to the official story, beams
from WTC 1 collapsed the building. However,
the collapse did not make a debris pile.
It made a debris hole.
I
TRULY DON'T BELIEVE THESE HEATERS ARE
RUNNING A TEMPERATURE EVEN APPROACHING
1000 DEGREES KELVIN (1300+ DEGREES FARENHEIT)
DO YOU???
I
THINK THE RATHER THIN WIRE MESH
AND
INEXPERNSIVE METAL
ON
THESE HEATERS WOULD PROBABLY MELT
BEFORE
THE WTC BUILDINGS' ASTM
E119 UL CERTIFIED STEEL WOULD!!!
(The
time temperature curves for the ASTM
E119 standard require the samples
to be exposed to temperatures around 2000
degrees farenheit for several hours)
FULL ARTICLE BELOW...
OH, AND THAT'S RIGHT...NO
AIRPLANE HIT WTC #7!!!
UL
Executive Speaks Out On WTC Study
911Truth.org
11-14-4
- "The
buildings should have easily
withstood the thermal stress
caused by pools of burning
jet fuel."
-
- From Kevin
R. Ryan
- Site Manager
of the Environmental Health
Laboratories
- South
Bend, Indiana
- (Company
site - www.ehl.cc)
-
- A division
of Underwriters Laboratories,
Inc.
- (Company
site - www.ul.com)
-
- To Frank
Gayle
- Deputy
Chief of the Metallurgy
Division
- Material
Science and Engineering
Laboratory
- National
Institute of Standards and
Technology
- NIST and
the World Trade Center at
wtc.nist.gov
- Dr. Gayle
biography wtc.nist.gov/pi/wtc_profiles.asp?lastname=gayle
-
- From:
Kevin R Ryan/SBN/ULI
- To: frank.gayle@nist.gov
- Date:
11/11/2004
-
- Dr. Gayle,
-
- Having
recently reviewed your team's
report of 10/19/04, I felt
the need to contact you
directly.
-
- As I'm
sure you know, the company
I work for certified the
steel components used in
the construction of the
WTC buildings. In requesting
information from both our
CEO and Fire Protection
business manager last year,
I learned that they did
not agree on the essential
aspects of the story, except
for one thing - that the
samples we certified met
all requirements. They suggested
we all be patient and understand
that UL was working with
your team, and that tests
would continue through this
year. I'm aware of UL's
attempts to help, including
performing tests on models
of the floor assemblies.
But the results of these
tests appear to indicate
that the buildings should
have easily withstood the
thermal stress caused by
pools of burning jet fuel.
-
- There
continues to be a number
of "experts" making public
claims about how the WTC
buildings fell. One such
person, Dr. Hyman Brown
from the WTC construction
crew, claims that the buildings
collapsed due to fires at
2000F melting the steel
(1). He states "What caused
the building to collapse
is the airplane fuel ? burning
at 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit.
The steel in that five-floor
area melts." Additionally,
the newspaper that quotes
him says "Just-released
preliminary findings from
a National Institute of
Standards and Technology
study of the World Trade
Center collapse support
Brown's theory."
-
- We know
that the steel components
were certified to ASTM E119.
The time temperature curves
for this standard require
the samples to be exposed
to temperatures around 2000F
for several hours. And as
we all agree, the steel
applied met those specifications.
Additionally, I think we
can all agree that even
un-fireproofed steel will
not melt until reaching
red-hot temperatures of
nearly 3000F (2). Why Dr.
Brown would imply that 2000F
would melt the high-grade
steel used in those buildings
makes no sense at all.
-
- The results
of your recently published
metallurgical tests seem
to clear things up (3),
and support your team's
August 2003 update as detailed
by the Associated Press
(4), in which you were ready
to "rule out weak steel
as a contributing factor
in the collapse". The evaluation
of paint deformation and
spheroidization seem very
straightforward, and you
noted that the samples available
were adequate for the investigation.
Your comments suggest that
the steel was probably exposed
to temperatures of only
about 500F (250C), which
is what one might expect
from a thermodynamic analysis
of the situation.
-
- However
the summary of the new NIST
report seems to ignore your
findings, as it suggests
that these low temperatures
caused exposed bits of the
building's steel core to
"soften and buckle"(5).
Additionally this summary
states that the perimeter
columns softened, yet your
findings make clear that
"most perimeter panels (157
of 160) saw no temperature
above 250C". To soften steel
for the purposes of forging,
normally temperatures need
to be above 1100C (6). However,
this new summary report
suggests that much lower
temperatures were be able
to not only soften the steel
in a matter of minutes,
but lead to rapid structural
collapse.
-
- This story
just does not add up. If
steel from those buildings
did soften or melt, I?m
sure we can all agree that
this was certainly not due
to jet fuel fires of any
kind, let alone the briefly
burning fires in those towers.
That fact should be of great
concern to all Americans.
Alternatively, the contention
that this steel did fail
at temperatures around 250C
suggests that the majority
of deaths on 9/11 were due
to a safety-related failure.
That suggestion should be
of great concern to my company.
-
- There
is no question that the
events of 9/11 are the emotional
driving force behind the
War on Terror. And the issue
of the WTC collapse is at
the crux of the story of
9/11. My feeling is that
your metallurgical tests
are at the crux of the crux
of the crux. Either you
can make sense of what really
happened to those buildings,
and communicate this quickly,
or we all face the same
destruction and despair
that come from global decisions
based on disinformation
and "chatter".
-
- Thanks
for your efforts to determine
what happened on that day.
You may know that there
are a number of other current
and former government employees
that have risked a great
deal to help us to know
the truth. I've copied one
of these people on this
message as a sign of respect
and support. I believe your
work could also be a nucleus
of fact around which the
truth, and thereby global
peace and justice, can grow
again. Please do what you
can to quickly eliminate
the confusion regarding
the ability of jet fuel
fires to soften or melt
structural steel.
-
- 1. http://www.boulderweekly.com/archive/102104/coverstory.html
-
- 2. CRC
Handbook of Chemistry and
Physics, 61st edition, pg
D-187
-
- 3. http://wtc.nist.gov/media/P3MechanicalandMetAnalysisofSteel.pdf
-
- 4. http://www.voicesofsept11.org/archive/911ic/082703.php
-
- 5. http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NCSTACWTCStatusFINAL101904WEB2.pdf
(pg 11)
-
- 6. http://www.forging.org/FIERF/pdf/ffaaMacSleyne.pdf
-
- Kevin
Ryan
- Site Manager
- Environmental
Health Laboratories
-
- [Note:
The letter is followed in
the e-mail by a standard
UL message footer]
-
- -- For
more information about UL,
its Marks, and its services
for EMC, quality registrations
and product certifications
for global markets, please
access our web sites at
http://www.ul.com and http://www.ulc.ca,
or contact your local sales
representative.
-
- November
12:
-
- An executive
of the company that certified
the steel used in the construction
of the World Trade Center
has questioned the common
theory that fuel fires caused
its collapse, in a letter
yesterday to the head of
the government team that
has spent two years studying
how the trade center was
built and why it fell.
-
- The author
of the letter, Kevin Ryan,
is site manager at Environmental
Health Laboratories in South
Bend, Indiana, a division
of Underwriters Laboratories,
the product-compliance and
testing giant. Because UL
certified the WTC steel
for its ability to withstand
fires, its performance on
September 11 is obviously
of concern to the company.
-
- Ryan sent
his letter to Frank Gayle,
deputy chief of the Metallurgy
Division at the National
Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST). He later
forwarded it in an e-mail
to David Ray Griffin, author
of the New Pearl Harbor,
and Catherine Austin Fitts,
who is a member of the 911Truth.org
board.
-
- Griffin
asked for and received permission
to forward the letter for
Web distribution. 911Truth.org
called Ryan today to confirm
his authorship.
-
- The letter
raises disturbing questions,
pointing out that the steel
in the towers tested up
to its certified standard
(i.e., it should have easily
withstood the fuel fires
without buckling).
-
- A chemist
by profession, Ryan said
he is acting in the hope
of receiving a public response
from Gayle. Given the impact
of September 11 on events
around the world, Ryan said,
everyone needs to know the
full truth of what really
happened on that day. He
added that he considers
Gayle to be a good scientist
and an honest person.
-
- A draft
of the government agency's
final report on the WTC
collapse is due in January.
-
- The New
York Times reports today
that the NIST team is planning
to hold some of its deliberations
in secret. "The announcement
has been sharply protested
by advocates for families
of the 9/11 victims, who
said they were considering
a lawsuit to force the agency
to open the meetings to
the public," the Times writes.
-
- As the
Times notes, the NIST investigation
was started in 2002 after
lobbying by, among others,
the Skyscraper Safety Campaign,
an organization created
by Monica Gabrielle and
Sally Regenhard, both of
whom lost family on September
11.
-
- Gabrielle
told the Times that NIST
should have "one job, and
one job only - to find out
the truth of what happened
to those buildings and to
report to the public about
it. You don't owe industry,
the Port Authority or federal
agencies anything. You owe
it to the public - the truth,
no matter where it goes."
(See www.nytimes.com)
-
- http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041112144051451
- 911Truth.org (nl)
-
-
- Comment
- From Andrea
- 11-14-4
-
- On seeing
this research from UL, I
am pushing for transparent*,
fully public meetings/hearings
on the structure/physical
evidence related to the
deterioration of the towers
into their foundations -these
meetings conducted by the
NIST, the gov division under
the DeptCommerce, under
the Executive Branch, aka
- "The White House".
-
- Rather
than be immutable or mysterious
about this research on the
(Bethlehem Steel produced)
steel in the towers, I found
this important information
to those who have the interest
to understand the truth
about what happened at the
WTC on 9/11/01.
-
- I owned
stock in Bethlehem Steel
before it was driven into
bankruptcy and liquidated.
I knew it had made the i-beams
and girders for the WTC,
and found it annoying when
the under-informed would
attempt to convince me that
we dont/didnt even make
steel strong enough to support
construction like the towers,
and that steel strong enough
for construction like the
WTC comes/came from Japan.
Au contraire! A look at
the remaining steel while
at the site also speaks
otherwise.
-
- This government
is to answer to the American
people. I see no reason
for secrecy when the people
in the government are looking
for 'transparency' from
everything else. Our privacy
is under invasion and the
government wants opaque
secrecy?
-
-
- Comment
From Scott T Davis
11-14-4
-
- Dear Jeff,
-
- I want
to ask all Americans - who
have just read this article
which has such overwhelming
statistical information
exposing the World Trade
Center cover-up - to take
just a minute and e-mail
the article to their Senators,
Congressional Representatives
and all media outlets.
-
- All the
e-mail information we need
to expose the coverup is
right on the main page of
your web site.
-
- We as
Americans are held accountable
for our actions by government
everyday. It's well past
time we hold the people
we employ to represent us
equally as accountable.
-
- Scott
T Davis
-
-
Guy
S. Razer, LtCol, USAF
(Retired but not Tired,
Inspired!)
In
a land where tyranny is
the primary rule of law,
the
only 2 unpatriotic acts,
in
the arena of communication,
are
silence
and ungood doublequackspeak
(1984 Newspeak)!!!
www.myspace.com/supereagle69
Member/Associations:
www.PatriotsQuestion.com
www.PatriotCalendar.com
www.Pilotsfor911Truth.org
www.V911T.org
(Veterans for Truth)
www.stj911.org
(Scholars for Truth &
Justice)
www.Visibility911.com
Interviews
on file with:
www.currentissues.tv
www.v911t.org
www.Pilotsfor911Truth.org
www.Visibility911.com
-
-
|
|
|
|
|
