|
The
top 15 floors of a WTC tower would impact the ground with
about 456 times more force than was recorded by the Seismographs
associated with the collpase of the WTC towers. Keep in mind,
this is just the top 15 floors, there are 110 floors. Do you
see a problem here?
Richter TNT for
Seismic Example
Magnitude Energy Yield (approximate)
-1.5 6 ounces Breaking
a rock on a lab table
0.6 18 pounds
1.0 30 pounds Large Blast at a Construction Site
1.5 320 pounds
2.0 1 ton Large Quarry or Mine Blast
2.3 3 ton Magnitude of quake of WTC building 1
2.5 4.6 tons
3.0 29 tons
http://www.seismo.unr.edu/ftp/pub/louie/class/100/magnitude.html
| Date |
Origin
Time (UTC) |
Magnitude
(Richter scale) |
Time
(EDT) |
Dominant
Period |
Signal
Duration |
Remark |
| 09/11/2001 |
12:46:26±1 |
0.9 |
08:46:26 |
0.8 sec |
12 seconds |
first impact |
| 09/11/2001 |
13:02:54±2 |
0.7 |
09:02:54 |
0.6 sec |
6 seconds |
second impact |
| 09/11/2001 |
13:59:04±1 |
2.1 |
09:59:04 |
0.8 sec |
10 seconds |
first collapse |
| 09/11/2001 |
14:28:31±1 |
2.3 |
10:28:31 |
0.9 sec |
8 seconds |
second collapse |
| 09/11/2001 |
21:20:33±2 |
0.6 |
17:20:33 |
0.7 sec |
18 seconds |
Building 7 collapse |
The question:
Is there enough energy in the collapse of the buildings
to create a 2.1 magnitude with a 10 sec duration, and 2.3
magnitude with a 8 sec duration? Building 7 creates only
a 0.6 magnitude with an 18 second duration. Why the huge
difference in magnitude and duration between 7 and the WTC
towers? Is that the difference you would expect in magnitude
and duration? 7 barley shakes the ground, but has about
2 times the duration? That just doesn't make sense, does
it? If the buildings caused the ground shaking, then one
should see a predicable proportional difference between
7 and the WTC towers, based on the differing energies generated
by the collapses. What is astounding is the fact that
the energy released in the 2nd collapse, is 2 times the
energy released in the 1st collapse, and the energy released
by the collapse of WTC 7 is less than .30 % of either prior
collapse. Someone crunch those numbers please. What
is the energy difference between a 2.1 and a 2.3, and a
0.6? Exponential scale? Seismographic evidence courtesy
of Columbia University Geology Department
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_wtc.html
The differences
in the energy released between WTC 1 and WTC 2 and WTC 7
is huge.
|
Comparison of Energy Release
of WTC 1 vs. WTC 2
|
joules of
wtc 1/joules of wtc 2 = %
2 89125090/177827900 = 50.11% ,
There was twice as much energy released in the second
collapse
89125090 (joules of first collapse) x 2 = 178250180
The question here is why would the Twin Towers not have
Twin energy release? |
|
Building 7 was about 1/2 the
Height, and 1/3 the mass of the twin towers.
|
501187.2/177827900
= 0.2818 % = 501119
Less than one percent of the energy released by the
2nd collapse is released by building 7? |
Earthquake power calculator: http://home.att.net/~srschmitt/script_earthquake.html
ERROR: 'Seismic Spikes Preceded the Towers' Collapses'
http://www.911review.com/errors/wtc/seismic.html
Conclusion:
The top 15 floors of a WTC tower would impact the ground with
about 6 times more force than was recorded by the Seismographs.
Keep in mind, this is just the top 15 floors, there are 110
floors. Do you see a problem here?
It looks like the
earthquakes are way too small. Could that be because the mass
of the buildings were dispersed by pulverization? Or is it
due to inefficient transfer of energy to the ground? Or a
combination thereof?
The buildings alone
did not cause the release of energy, something else did, or
a combination of the buildings and something else did.
Also trying to
look at each floor as a separate entity, still working on
that. I am not sure it is worth the effort.
As far as the "pancake theory" is concerned:
Of interest here is the fact that atmosphere alone would stop
the top 15 Floors from accelerating just from drag, if you
dropped it from above 12, 401 feet. This begs the question,
how much would it be slowed down if it had to fall through
the rest of the WTC tower?
The density of
a WTC Tower is 371800000/59185152 = 6.28 lbs per cubic feet
Air density is 0.07 lbs per cubic foot
The density of
the medium that a body falls through has an effect on it's
Terminal Velocity.
A body will fall in a liquid slower than it will through a
gas, and even slower through something solid. When stuff gets
in the way, it slows down the thing moving through it, the
more stuff in the way, the slower the body goes, if it is
not stopped entirely. A bullet goes through the air faster
than it goes through a 10 foot thick brick wall, when you
move something it takes work/energy to do it. In the case
of things falling, we know exactly what that quanity of energy
is. This refutes the "pancake theory" in a solid
and provable way, based on the bedrocks of Newtonian physics.
Things fall slower when they fall through denser medium.
http://www.v911t.org/FreefallForceImpact.php
Another Study:
http://www.v911t.org/BombsWTC-Seismic.php
More on the Physics
of 9/11:
http://www.v911t.org/911Physics.php
==============================
Below
is the start of a study of the energy, treating each floor
as a separte entity. What would a seismograph look like if
the ground was impacted in such a manner as is listed below?
| Height |
Energy |
Floor |
| 413.21 |
6208394137.036001 |
109
|
| 409.42 |
6151450176.872 |
108
|
| 405.63 |
6094506216.707999 |
107
|
| 401.84 |
6037562256.543998 |
106
|
| 398.05 |
5980618296.379997 |
105
|
| 394.26 |
5923674336.215996 |
104 |
| 390.47 |
5866730376.051995
|
103 |
| 386.68 |
5809786415.887994 |
102 |
| 382.89 |
5752842455.723993 |
101 |
| 379.1 |
5695898495.559992
|
100 |
| 375.31 |
5638954535.395991----------------------
= 64534034136.571945 sub tot |
99 |
| 371.52 |
5582010575.23199 |
98 |
| 367.73 |
5525066615.067989 |
97 |
| 363.94 |
5468122654.903988 |
96 |
| 360.15 |
5411178694.739987
------------------------ = 27055893473.699935 |
95 |
| 356.36 |
5354234734.575986
|
94 |
| 352.57 |
5297290774.411985 |
93 |
| 348.78 |
5240346814.247984 ------------------------ = 27055893473.699935 |
92 |
| 344.99 |
5183402854.083983 <56943960.164001> <-----------
this is the contant in - |
91 |
| 341.2 |
5126458893.919982 |
90 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
